When compared to historical and present animal exports from Guyana to zoos, the model partnership in development offers some striking and critical differences, and demonstrates much greater social, ecological, and economic benefits to Guyana.
Issue |
Historical Trade |
Jacksonville Zoo |
Owners of Animals |
Buyer - the Zoo |
Guyana
|
Owners of Offspring |
Buyer - the Zoo |
Guyana
|
Direct Financial Beneficiaries |
Trader, trappers; export taxes to Guyana |
Conservation in Guyana through a Trust Fund (support for education and research)
|
Other Beneficiaries |
Side businesses involved in the trade |
Tourism industry through marketing; craft trade through linked zoo sales
|
Financial Return
(based on Jaguars) |
Single payment. (The price of trade Jaguars in the USA is US$500) |
Estimated direct US$20,000 over twenty years of life; not including offspring; not including side benefits and in-kind contributions
|
Up Front Benefits |
None |
Contributions to conservation as part of the partnership (US$115,000)
|
Potential Long Term Benefits |
Business as usual, but will end when animals no longer required |
Fundraising, public relations, and marketing linkages to US; offspring always owned by Guyana
|
Impact on Wild Population |
Negative - capture of healthy animals, no conservation benefits |
Already captive animals only, or problem animals that would otherwise be killed; wildlife management for species improved
|
Partnerships |
Short term; trader-buyer |
Long term; many partners including Government, NGO's and local communities
|
External Image of Guyana |
Generally negative as a result of international perceptions about the "wildlife trade" |
Positive public relations and marketing materials presented through "Range of the Jaguar" exhibit and press
|
Interpretation at Zoo |
General, not specific to Guyana |
Specific to, and supportive of, Guyana leading to tourism and green labelling
|
Animal Care |
Wild animals captured and caged for sale; monitoring by Wildlife Division in Guyana |
Already captive animals or problem animals that would have been killed (Jaguars killing cows); care strictly monitored by vets, cages improved
|
Other Issues |
Wildlife "trade" difficult to manage and international perceptions highly negative |
Based on direct partnerships for innovative conservation financing; open and transparent to all
|